Primary care · Illustrative example
A primary care group recovered $285K through E&M optimization
An eight-provider primary care group in the Midwest was stuck in a revenue paradox: more visits, flat collections. Under-coding Evaluation and Management, overlooked Chronic Care Management, and inconsistent AWV and TCM billing were quietly eroding the bottom line. We recovered $285K in untapped revenue through precise coding optimization and workflow redesign.
- $285K
- Additional annual revenue
- 28% → 41%
- E&M Level 4 capture
- $96K
- New CCM revenue
- 91% → 97.2%
- Net collection rate
Illustrative example — a representative scenario, not a specific client.
Despite a 12% increase in visit volume over two years — from 28,000 to 31,360 encounters annually — net collections had barely moved from $8.2M. The net collection rate languished at 91%, a figure that masked deeper issues.
The root problem was E&M under-coding. Providers, stretched thin by a payer mix heavy on Medicare (45%) and commercial (35%), routinely defaulted to lower E&M levels. Only 28% of visits were coded as Level 4 (99214) or higher, versus industry benchmarks of 35–45% for similar practices. Complex cases involving multiple chronic conditions and time-intensive counseling were billed as straightforward Level 3s because nobody had mapped the documentation to justify the medical decision-making level earned.
Compounding it: Chronic Care Management generated zero revenue despite a 40% patient panel with two-plus chronic conditions. Annual Wellness Visits were sporadically scheduled and often miscoded. Transitional Care Management (99495/99496) was entirely absent from billing even as readmissions ticked upward.
We started with an E&M coding audit across all eight providers. Every Level 3 billed in the prior quarter, re-reviewed against documentation. The pattern was clear: roughly 13% of Level 3s had documentation that actually supported Level 4. Nobody had been reading for it.
We built provider-specific coaching — not lectures, but a monthly one-pager per physician showing their E&M distribution versus peers, with specific encounter examples flagged for missed capture. Over 90 days, Level 4 capture moved from 28% to 41%.
Simultaneously, we launched a CCM program end-to-end. Eligible patients identified. Consent workflow built. Monthly care coordination documented. Billing for 99490 and 99439 initiated. TCM workflow installed for post-discharge patients with G2012 and 99495/99496 billed correctly. AWV scheduling and coding standardized.
Year-one impact: $285K additional revenue. $189K from E&M optimization alone. $96K from the new CCM program. Denial rate halved. Net collections at 97.2%, up from 91%. AR days from 42 to 24.
The E&M coaching was the most durable change — not just a billing intervention but a documentation improvement that compounded over time. The CCM program became a standalone service line generating recurring revenue the practice hadn't known was available.
Free audit
Have a similar problem?
We'll audit your workflow for free and show you exactly what your recovery looks like — specific codes, specific payers, specific dollar amounts.