Podiatry · Illustrative example
A multi-location podiatry group recovered $420K in six months
A four-location podiatry group treating thousands of patients annually — from diabetic foot care to complex ankle reconstructions — was quietly losing six figures in revenue behind the scenes. Six months after switching to DeltaRCM, the practice wrote a staff bonus check for the first time in two years.
- $420K
- Recovered in 6 months
- 18% → 4.5%
- Denial rate
- 45 → 24
- AR days
- 82% → 96%
- Clean claim rate
Illustrative example — a representative scenario, not a specific client.
The physicians were delivering exceptional clinical care across four locations, but the revenue cycle was fractured. Each location operated with its own billing staff, creating inconsistency in coding practices, modifier application, and denial follow-up. The practice lacked centralized visibility into financial performance — a critical vulnerability for any multi-location operation.
The numbers told a troubling story. An 18% denial rate — well above industry benchmarks for podiatry (8–12%). AR aging at 45 days, meaning cash wasn't flowing back into operations fast enough. Claims getting lost in the shuffle. Many already past timely filing deadlines by the time anyone noticed, making them uncollectable.
A deeper audit revealed the root causes. The billing team, while well-intentioned, lacked specialized expertise in podiatry-specific coding complexities. Modifier 51 (bilateral procedures) and 59 (distinct procedural services) were being applied inconsistently. DME billing — a significant revenue stream for a practice fitting custom orthotics and diabetic shoes — was essentially abandoned, sitting in a backlog of unprocessed claims. And six months of aged claims had accumulated, many beyond the 180-day recovery window. Conservative estimate of leakage: $25,000–$30,000 per month.
We started with a thirty-day audit. Every denial in the last twelve months, categorized by CPT, payer, and location. Every DME claim stuck in backlog, triaged by recoverability. A chart sampling across the four locations for at-risk-foot and wound-care documentation.
Then we took over operations in parallel with the existing staff — no cliff, no rip-and-replace. Submission and posting moved to our platform. Denial work concentrated under a named podiatry-fluent team lead. Modifier logic standardized across all four locations. DME billing resumed with LCD-compliant documentation templates installed at every point of care.
Compliance sampling ran alongside the billing work. Every high-audit-risk code category — 11721 nail debridement, at-risk-foot exams, DME fittings — got monthly chart-review coverage, with a defense file maintained for every flagged encounter. The goal was two-sided: recover lost revenue and eliminate audit exposure simultaneously.
Inside six months: denial rate from 18% to 4.5%. AR days from 45 to 24. Clean-claim rate from 82% to 96%. Net collections from 91% to 106% — the 106% reflecting recovery of previously written-off AR that aggressive backlog work brought back in-window.
Total additional revenue, six months after onboarding: $420,000. Same practice, same patient volume, same physicians — different billing discipline.
The downstream effects were operational as much as financial. Staff morale improved because the denial queue was no longer a black hole. The practice manager got a monthly packet she could actually show the partners. And when a RAC letter arrived for a routine DME claim audit two months in, we handled it start-to-finish with no disruption to the practice.
Free audit
Have a similar problem?
We'll audit your workflow for free and show you exactly what your recovery looks like — specific codes, specific payers, specific dollar amounts.